Harbor House Collaborative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208006412
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
7194735557
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Residential Mental Health Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$206,908
Expenses
$237,320
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Harbor house collaborative provides safe places to work towards sobriety, healthier living and self suffiency. Harbor house is a transitional, supportive housing program for the chronically homeless inebriate. The harbor house clinic is an affordable community drug and alcohol counseling center. The women's substance abuse treatment program provides gender specific addiction counseling and recovery support services.

What it reported doing in 2012

The harbor house clinic is a Colorado state division of behavioral health certified drug and alcohol community clinic providing affordable, multi-dimensional services to individuals and the general public that are affected by the disease of addiction and its consequences. The harbor house clinic provides a variety of services including individual counseling, group counseling, outreach and public education programming, dui education and therapy. Clinic staff strive to identify and fill treatment gaps that exist in the community. We serve by supporting the principle that substance abuse is a community-based problem, and we recognize and embrace the theory that most substance abusers have an underlying mental health concern which can be treated along with substance abuse treatment. The clinic uses evidence based practices including, but not limited to, cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -77.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $212K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.