Happy Trails School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 384027584
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5203257556
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Day Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,092,782
- Expenses
- $961,084
- Assets
- $274,987
- Liabilities
- $21,943
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REV RICHARD JONES (Vice President)
- JANICE LATHREM (President)
Highest reported compensation
- THERESA REYNOLDS (Treasurer): $58,092 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To operate a daycare and pre-school center for young children in a christian atmosphere keeping with the tenets of the united methodist church & of the association of christian schools international.
What it reported doing in 2021
Operated daycare & preschool center
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 44
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.7% of revenue deployed · 82.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $795K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.