Hannahs Hope for Life Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 275221220
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2011–2013
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2013
Location: Twin Falls, ID, USA
Phone: 2088376253
Rating: 64
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Christianity
Affiliation: Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue: $56,026
Expenses: $89,568
Assets: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Sandra Bates (President)

People named in this filing

Sherrie Campa (Secretary)
Sandra Bates (President)
Laurie Silver (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The object and purpose of this organization shall be to financially aid individuals and teams allowing athletes to participate in athletic programs, trageting smaller schools, by furnishing equipment, uniforms, camps, tournaments, competitions, or otherwise assisting individual athletes in need. To financially conriubute to Idaho pediatric cancer families in need. Providing items such as gas, food, or other family needs. To educate the general public of the attributes of supporting youth with cancer, activities within the school system and to encourage and support families in time of need.

What it reported doing in 2013

Congtributions to various other groups and individuals pursuant to the stated purpose of this organization.

Operating model

Revenue model: Other-operating. 79% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model: Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 62
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 12
Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -59.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -82.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $80K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
Schedules: 4 filed schedules
Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.