Hannah's House Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474149725
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Independence, KS, USA
Phone
6203311054
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$159,782
Expenses
$171,403
Assets
$297,371
Liabilities
$25,362

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DICK DRUMELLER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DICK DRUMELLER (PRESIDENT)
  • VALERIE DAVIS (VICE PRESIDE)
  • LISA DRUMELLER (TREASURER/SE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

"peace in the midst of the storm" providing hope for the hopeless. Hannah's house is a christ centered ministry restoring people to god. Established to bring help, healing and hope by breaking chains of addiction, the cycle of destructive behavior and helping through crisis situations. Our vision is to provide services that will take participants from unstable circumstances to stability in every area of life by becoming part of a community and family and then sharing their freedom with others. Your generosity has provided housing, utilities, furniture, food, supplies, transporation, life empowerment, discipleship training, and staff for a life transforming season. Hannah's house program asks for a 6-month commitment and are required to complete contracts to graduate. This training time transforms their life and gives them tools for success. Each contract they must complete summaries of required bible study, memorization of bible versus, character trait studies, and one book read with e

What it reported doing in 2024

Strategy: the ministry will include three areas: housing, mentoring, and employment. Housing: hannah's house has short-term transitional housing located in independence, Kansas. The phase 1 housing will shelter adult men and women 18 years of age and older. We request a commitment of six months and during this time residents must complete contracts based on life change and discipleship. The standard length of stay may range from one night to three years depending on the commitment leel and need of the resident. Basic living necessities will be provided for residents and will include three meals a day, toiletries, clothing, and laundry facilities. Residents will participate in cooking, cleaning, lawn care, house maintenance, laundy and self-care. As residents move to the second phase, we have furnished apartments and houses available as they start working. Long-term housing needs for residents will be addressed with staff, volunteer workers, social workers, and community organizations to identify available options for either private living or publicly supported housing programs. Mentoring and training: volunteer mentors will be utilized to promote a person's physical, mental, spiritual, and emotional health. Goal planning with the director will take place and establish a plan for each resident individually. Daily classes are provided for growth. The basic goal is to help a person re-adjust and become established within our community. This mentoring relationship will ordinarily extend beyond the time a resident lives in the home. Hannah's house residental program will provide community entry points for former residents and be a resource as each person reconstructs a social network and builds core support relationships. There were 67 residents in 2024, 32 men, 28 women and 7 children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.2%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 52.4%; rating input score 52
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.2% of revenue deployed · 52.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.