Hannah Grace Family
Legal name: Hannah Grace Hannah Grace Family
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822945261
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Oregon City, OR, United States
- Phone
- (503) 891-0158
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Foster Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $246,998
- Expenses
- $227,972
- Assets
- $89,446
- Liabilities
- $-222
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tara Hood (President and Founder)
Highest reported compensation
- Tara Hood (President and Founder): $47,500 total reported compensation
- Jason Hood (Board Member and Program Manager): $21,100 total reported compensation
- Whitney Hill (Secretary/non voting board member): $4,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to restore and cultivate healthy families by establishing trust, building self-worth and redefining how they see themselves.
What it reported doing in 2024
Expenses and grants associated with facilitated visitations with foster families. Expenses included costs associated with background checks, building expenses, insurance required by the State of Oregon and financial support provided to foster families encountering small unforseen expenses to maintain stability in their daily lives. Expenses also include $46,000 in facility rent expense and admin costs of $2,669. Revenue includes income from sublease.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 33
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.5%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 47.1%; rating input score 47
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 43.5% of revenue deployed · 47.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $107K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $48K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 41 of 43 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.