Hands of Grace Dfw

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331661155
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
North Richland Hills, TX, USA
Phone
8178938733
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,264
Expenses
$1,784
Assets
$4,540
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Daryl Spann (President)

People named in this filing

  • Wendy Campos (Secretary)
  • James Goodwin (Treasurer)
  • Daryl Spann (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Public Charity

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, our organization made a significant impact in addressing food insecurity within our community by serving more than 10,800 individuals and families in need. Through coordinated outreach efforts, our dedicated volunteer teams actively traveled to areas with high concentrations of individuals experiencing homelessness to distribute meals and essential food supplies directly to those who needed them most. In addition to our ongoing food assistance initiatives, we were honored to collaborate with partner organizations to bring hope and joy during the holiday season. Together, we successfully provided Christmas support to 386 children, ensuring they experienced the warmth and celebration of the season. We also strengthened our community partnerships by contributing resources and support to fellow nonprofit organizations we work alongside. By combining efforts and sharing resources, we were able to expand our collective reach and further enhance the services provided to vulnerable populations throughout the year. Through strategic collaboration, dedicated volunteers, and a strong commitment to service, 2025 marked a year of meaningful growth and measurable impact for our organization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 58.2%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.54; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.