Hand in Hand Yemen Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853145583
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Dearborn Hts, MI, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,642
Expenses
$7,016
Assets
$137,735

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Yasmeen Mawry (President)

People named in this filing

  • Yasmeen Mawry (President)
  • Mark Patterson (secretary)
  • Trinity Henderson (treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hand in Hand Yemen provides humanitarian relief to families affected by the famine crisis in Yemen. We support communities facing extreme hunger by delivering food assistance clean water access and emergency aid to individuals who are starving or at risk. Our programs focus on reducing malnutrition preventing hunger-related deaths and improving the well-being of vulnerable families through direct charitable support.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hand in Hand Yemen supported families in becoming self-sustaining through agricultural development and livestock assistance. The organization helped households start small farms raise animals such as cattle goats and poultry and develop greenhouse projects. These programs created long-term income sources reduced dependency on emergency aid and strengthened food security in famine-affected areas.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.2%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 95.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.63; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 29.1% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $91K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.