Hanayagi Dancing Academy Hawaii Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770601573
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Honolulu, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8082281139
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Dance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,745
- Expenses
- $23,161
- Assets
- $70,840
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENSEN TOMA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JENSEN TOMA (PRESIDENT)
- KATHY HAMADA-KWOCK (VICE PRES./D)
- SHERYL LEGASPI (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Education
What it reported doing in 2024
Purpose of the foundation: the foundation is organized exclusively for cultural and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. Such cultural and education purposes shall include but not be limited to the teaching of classical japanese dance and the playing of japanese instruments such as the samisen and tsuzumi (hand drum). In an effort to perpetuate the classical japan dance and the playing of classical japanese instruments in Hawaii, the foundation provides dance and instrument recitals to the public free of charge. In an effort to maintain the level of standard of these performances, professional dancing and musical instructors of the hanayagi school in japan are brought in to teach, assist and augment the "kai" (formal recital). In the past, the expenses for these teachers, as well as the production cost, have been the sole responsibility of the students of the hanayagi dancing academy. Yearly hanayagi academy sponsored recitals are performed at the beginning of the year and a "kai" sponsored by the academy every four years to the public. The academy also performs yearly at the japanese chamber of commerce new year's celebration, as well as at numerous other japanese cultural activities. Such performances have included performing at the japanese embassy in honolulu and at numerous temples. On an average, the academy students perform at least 6 times during the year in full formal kimomo dress before the general public. However, at no time do the students of the academy or its teachers receive any fee for their performances. The students and teachers who range in age from 3 to 70+ years old are dedicated to the perpetuation of this japanese art form which goes back hundreds of years in japanese history. With declining enrollment of the students and the rising cost of putting on these free performances and "kai", it has become incumbent upon the academy to seek outside grants and donations to supplement this effort to preserve this aspect of the japanese culture.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.8%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.06; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.