Hampton Terrace Community Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813475196
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8133588080
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,780
- Expenses
- $18,636
- Assets
- $39,635
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cassandra Plumridge (President)
- Courtney L Babic (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Cassandra Plumridge (President)
- Jeffrey Millburg (Treasurer)
- Courtney L Babic (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A voluntary association of individuals organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes for the residents of Hampton Terrace and the citizens of Tampa, FL. To foster and encourage a strong sense of community and neighborhood engagement among the residents of Hampton Terrace. To recruit community volunteers. To engage in non-partisan, non-political activities that foster communication and civic pride among residents of Hampton Terrace and the citizens of Tampa. To promote heightened awareness of issues affecting Hampton Terrace, Seminole Heights and the City of Tampa through education and communication.
What it reported doing in 2023
Upkeep of neighborhood infrastructure, including completed restoration fo the iconic entrance sign
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.1%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 48.1%; rating input score 48
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.5%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.13; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 36.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.1% of revenue deployed · 48.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.