Hampton Community Development Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541667250
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Hampton, VA, USA
Phone
7577275213
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Reported finances

Expenses
$4,783
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$125,033

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DARRELL K WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DARRELL K WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT POMPEYMARCH 2025 - JUNE 202 (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the hampton community development corporation is to enhance the quality of life in the city of hampton, Virginia, initially focusing its activities in the phoebus community. Hcdc will develop and implement a plan of revitalization for phoebus, in concert with hampton university, the hampton university business assistance center, residents of the phoebus community, the business community, and the public sector for property rehabilitation to provide housing and housing opportunities for low and moderate income families and for the revitalization of local business and business opportunites for the purpose of enhancing employment opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2024

To enhance the quality of life in the city of hampton by developing and implementing plans for the revitalization of targeted areas and to improve and provide housing and housing opportunities for low and moderate income families and revitalization of business and create business opportunities to enhance employment opportunities for residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.2% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.