Hammond Henry Hospital Auxiliary

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
363052725
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Geneseo, IL, USA
Phone
3099449130
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$74,203
Expenses
$75,601
Assets
$162,389
Liabilities
$679

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sue Elliott (Auxiliary President)
  • Martha Herron (Auxiliary Vice President)
  • Nancy Stover (Auxiliary Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Sue Elliott (Auxiliary President)
  • Martha Herron (Auxiliary Vice President)
  • Ellen Scranton (Auxiliary Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support for hospital patient care and healthcare services

What it reported doing in 2024

Rollator 65., Flash cards 140., Smart cuffs 1699., Squid shoulder system 610., Five backpacks 268., Two restorators 60., Western Aphasia battery 473., Wheelchair 1682., Five temporal scanners 881., Two LSI wireless transmitter 1990., Blaze pod 783., Fluency flips 65., Jumbo articulation book 100., Development motor scales 196., Kaye benches 642., Various toys 93., Sensory profile scoring subscription 140., Multi-purpose wedge 200., Hand held sprayer 1000., Two oxygen concentrators 3000., Surface mattress 1035., Three max storm air movers 480., Dish dispenser 457., Whisper Glide 4000., Relocate stain glass 2000.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.9%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.15; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -60% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.