Hamm Memorial Psychiatric Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411649502
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6512240614
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,976,016
- Expenses
- $3,892,370
- Assets
- $5,375,837
- Liabilities
- $1,925,127
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAEONE OLSON (PRESIDENT (THRU 12/24)/BOARD MEMBER)
- MAISHA GILES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JULIE BLUHM (INTERIM EXEC. DIR.(THRU 12/24)/CHAIR): $142,219 total reported compensation
- CRISTINA COMBS (DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL SERVICES): $121,077 total reported compensation
- STELLA CHEMARUM (PSYCHIATRIC NURSE PRACTITIONER): $118,320 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hamm clinic's mission is to promote mental health with culturally responsive, relational care for adults, especially for those facing financial barriers.
What it reported doing in 2024
Clinical services: hamm memorial psychiatric clinic provides a variety of outpatient mental health and related services to adults in the twin cities metropolitan area and statewide. The clinic offers a full spectrum of outpatient mental health services in person and via telehealth. The clinic seeks to treat symptoms and also to help clients gain insight and understanding into their behavior. The clinic provider team is comprised of clinical social workers, clinical counselors, psychologists, and psychiatric providers as well as interns working together to improve client's mental health. In fy 2025, the clinic had a total of 15,051 visits, serving 851 individuals with therapy needs. 21% of clients were unemployed at the time they sought services. 30% of clients accessed our income based sliding fee program or reduced rate services. 38% of clients served identified as a person of color.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 82.5%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 82.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $142K · 18 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $275K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.