Hamlin Collegiate Isd Education Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851803329
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Hamlin, TX, USA
Phone
3255763646
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,716
Expenses
$1,400
Assets
$53,070

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR RANDY BURKS (President)

People named in this filing

  • NICKIE POWELL (Director)
  • DR CHANDA BLOCH (Director)
  • JESSICA VILLANUEVA (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Hamlin Collegiate Education Foundation (HCEF) is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes to benefit the Hamlin Collegiate Independent School District (HCISD). Included in those purposes are the following: 1) provide funds, services, and property to supplement the teaching and service functions of HCISD; 2)make grants and donations for the purpose of furthering the educational objectives of HCISD; 3) Solicit, accept, administer, and disburse gifts, grants, property and services and hold property in trust for furthering the purpose of the (HCEF); receive government grants or other sources and disburse such grants for the support of education and educational projects of the HCISD.

What it reported doing in 2024

Solicited donations, conducted a fundraising event to accumulate funds for the organization's purpose. Teacher grants and assistance with funding supplies for teachers has been achieved.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.1%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 42.9%; rating input score 43

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 48.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 37.91; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -32.6% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -56.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.1% of revenue deployed · 42.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $600 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.