Hamilton Little Blue

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
811795802
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Hamilton, OH, USA
Phone
5132380486
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Football

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,251
Expenses
$61,694
Assets
$9,635

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRIS SOUTHERN (PRESIDENT/ BOARD)

People named in this filing

  • CHRIS SOUTHERN (PRESIDENT/ BOARD)
  • RICKELLE COON (TREASURER/ BOARD)
  • CLIFF AKERS (VICE PRES/ BOARD)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission, as an organization, is to provide an opportunity and environment to young men and women in our community that promotes safety, sportsmanship and skills-improvement in football and cheer. We strive to instruct the kids in our program in ways that promotes healthy competition while teaching proper skills and techniques of football and cheer to children of any experience level. It is our goal to promote a high level of integrity in all of our participants to ensure that hamilton little blue is one of the most respectable and reputable organizations in our area.

What it reported doing in 2022

The $61,694 expenses were used to promote safety, sportsmanship and skills- improvement in football and cheer in the young men and women in our community. The number of persons benefitted was 200 in which they achieved the techniques and healthy competition of football which led the kids to a high level of integrity to be one of the most respectable and reputable organizations in our area. The number of volunteers was 60 for this program

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.