Hamilton County VIPS Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
480813821
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Syracuse, KS, USA
Phone
6203847871
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Safety, Disaster Preparedness & Relief N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$118,233
Expenses
$115,794
Assets
$37,957
Liabilities
$4,692

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Janet Weis (Secretary)
  • Barbara O'Brate (Chairman)
  • Rosemary Clary (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Hamilton County VIP provides services to the elderly and shut-ins of the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our organization provides services to the elderly (those 60 and over or the spouse of someone 60 or over). These services include a meals program. Over 200 meals a week are provided during the year, including meals for shut-ins.Newsletters are published each month. Brochures explaining the services provided are printed each year. Assistance is provided to those applying for public benefits, those completing tax forms, and those signing up for or changing Medicare plans.Nutrition education is provided four times a year.Monthly health programs are held. These programs include blood pressure and oxygen level checks, blood sugar checks, and other health related presentations. An exercise group meets three times a week.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.