Hamilton Centers Youth Service Bureau

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
351305755
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Noblesville, IN, USA
Phone
3177736342
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Community Service Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$810,145
Expenses
$843,002
Assets
$321,312
Liabilities
$276,394

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promising Futures of Central Indiana provides resources to develop healthy relationships and create positive changes for youth and families.

What it reported doing in 2012

Family Access Center - Supervised visitations and exchanges occur at the Family Access Center, a comfortable location stocked with many of the comforts of homes, including toys, full kitchens, outdoor grill, books and puzzles.Supervised VisitationsUnder certain circumstances, it may be appropriate for a parent to be supervised when interacting with his or her children. supervised visitation allows a parent and child to spend time together in a neutral, safe and home-like environment while being assisted or observed by the Visitation Facilitator.During the visit, non-custodial parents are offered an opprotunity to spend time with and parent their child in a comfortable, safe environment. Guidance, assistance and feedback are provided as needed by the Visitation Facilitator.The child's welfare is assured during visits offering custodial parents or guardians peace of mind.Supervised ExchangesThe comfort and safety of the children is top priority. During a supervised exchange, children are transferred between a custodial parent or guardian and the non-custodial parent. The adult involved in the exchange do not have to come in contact with one another, and children are supervised until the arrival of the other parent. The children are safe, engaged and occupied while they wait for their parent.Supervised Exchanges reduce conflict witnessed by the children and are scheduled and confirmed with both parents by the Exchange Facilitator.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.1%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.86; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $608K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $77K · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.