Hamburger Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
951693616
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3238760550
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,743,445
Expenses
$20,537,516
Assets
$18,499,865
Liabilities
$9,873,139

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMBER NICOLE RIVAS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • CAROLYN ALICE LABBE (VICE PRESIDENT, PROGRAMS AND SERVICES)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMBER NICOLE RIVAS (PRESIDENT & CEO): $298,981 total reported compensation
  • USHA MURTHY (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (THRU 01/25)): $201,171 total reported compensation
  • KIM PETERSON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $184,442 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Aviva believes every child and every family in our los angeles community deserves the chance for a brighter future. We provide compassionate support, therapeutic services and guidance to at-risk children and families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Intensive community based services (icbs)a multidisciplinary approach to family services, icbs includes programs for the whole family as well as individualized treatments for children/youth clients based on the level of care they need. Often the child of a family has department of children and family services or probation involvement and may be facing removal from their home or the need for higher level of care. The goal of icbs is to work as a team to assist families by providing comprehensive care and support. Icbs also includes 24/7 crisis intervention. (continue on sch o)services may be provided under one of three sub-programs:-wraparound services: is a team-based approach with services designed to provide comprehensive, individualized support for people facing complex challenges including mental health, behavioral, educational or social issues. This approach is family driven, with the family's input preferences and cultural values guiding the planning and implementation of services.-full-service partnership (fsp): is a collaborative model that emphasizes partnership between service providers, aiming to deliver a comprehensive array of services tailored to individual needs. The services promote who person wellness, addressing medical, social, mental health, behavioral, and rehabilitative needs. This program focus is for individuals with severe challenges, such as homelessness, mental illness, department of children family services or probation involvement.-intensive field-capable intensive services (ifccs): is a field based trauma-sensitive mental health services delivered countywide and are available 24/7. Focus of this services is for individuals facing complex challenges, including mental health, behavioral, educational or social issues.these programs served a total of 219 unique clients in fy 2024-25; however, their family-focused approach multiplies their impact, benefiting almost 700 individuals over the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 86% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 75.6%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $29.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 75.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $15.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $299K · 22 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $134K reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.