Haltom City Rifle and Pistol Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
751488373
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Haltom City, TX, USA
Phone
8175854114
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fishing, Hunting

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,523
Expenses
$94,280
Assets
$1,321,537
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Wilde (President)
  • Ray Pierce (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Robert Davis (Director)
  • Till Hezel (Director)
  • Jim Jenkins (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The org. (HCRPC) maintains and operates a rifle and pistol range facility. The primary purpose of the Club is to promote safe and responsible participation and involvement in the shooting sports and outdoor activities such as wildlife conservation and habitat management. The public is invited to attend certain educational (Hunter Education. Junior Rifle Program and Public Sight In Days) and competitive events (5 regularly scheduled shooting matches). Educational opportunities include Range Officer Training, Hunter Education and a library of periodicals relating to firearms and other outdoor activities. Donations to charitable organizations such as the USO, Christ's Haven for Children, Tarrant County Food Bank and Meals on Wheels are examples of the giving conducted by the Club. The Club has provided opportunities for youth members to become active and involved in the shooting sports by sponsoring the Junior Rifle Club and periodic partnering with local youth engaged in Scouting.

What it reported doing in 2025

Education, Instruction and Community- The primary purpose of the Club is to promote safe and responsible participation and involvement in the shooting sports and outdoor activities such as wildlife conservation and habitat management. The public is invited to attend certain educational (Hunter Education, Junior Rifle Program and Guest Attendance) and competitive events (5 regularly scheduled shooting matches). Educational opportunities include Range Officer Training, Hunter Education and a library of periodicals relating to firearms and other outdoor activities. Public Sight In Days provide an opportunity for the public to attend the range on the weekend prior to the opening of deer season and engage with the Club members and other shooters to increase their knowledge base and hone their skills.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 27.6%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 17.3%; rating input score 17
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.6%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.02; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 27.6% of revenue deployed · 17.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.