Haller Lake Community Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
916056447
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2064995975
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,037
Expenses
$42,033
Assets
$266,132
Liabilities
$35,365

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kippy Irwin (President)
  • Shawn MacPherson (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kippy Irwin (President)
  • Nicole Rojas (Secretary)
  • Shawn MacPherson (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The club exists to provide social events for adults and children in the community of Haller Lake. The membership consist of around 100 hundred households. We produce a monthly newsletter to inform residents of neighborhood events, land use and zoning changes, public safety and the like. A monthly meeting is held at the club and on zoom with featured speakers on topics of interest to the community. In addition, events such as game night, Easter and Halloween family events are held. Rooms are rented for various special events.

What it reported doing in 2024

Various children and family oriented events e.g. Easter egg hunt, Halloween event Christmas cookie and organ music event, ice cream social, Community Dance nights.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.3%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.33; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -133.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.