Halifax County-south Boston Dixie Softball

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821558124
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Halifax, VA, USA
Phone
4344702320
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,312
Expenses
$62,451
Assets
$177,259
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tammy Hall (Vice President & Officer)
  • Jason Johnson (Vice President & Officer)
  • Phillip Saunders (Vice President & Officer)
  • Simon Jones Jr (President & Officer)
  • David Clark (Vice President & Officer)
  • Samantha Clark (Vice President & Officer)

People named in this filing

  • Tammy Hall (Vice President & Officer)
  • Jason Johnson (Vice President & Officer)
  • Phillip Saunders (Vice President & Officer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Operates a softball league for girls ages 4-18

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, the organization provided the opportunity for 328 girls ages 4-18 to play softball for a nominal fee. The girls played an organized sport that taught them teamwork, respect for authority, and life skills that will enable them to be productive citizens and provided an activity to improve their health and well-being.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.6%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.6%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.84; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 35.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.