Halifax County Athletic Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800954444
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
South Boston, VA, USA
Phone
4344763111
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$105,689
Expenses
$61,295
Assets
$95,840
Liabilities
$2,146

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MELISSA PERKINS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MELISSA PERKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • CARRIE PATE (TREASURER)
  • GABBY BRIDGERS (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The halifax county athletic booster club believes that high school athletics improves academic performance, promotes school spirit and creates community pride. Hcabc will work with all stakeholders to support excellence in athletics at halifax county high school.

What it reported doing in 2024

The hcabc will fulfill its mission by raising funds to support athletics, allocating funds to coaches/teams for their needs as approved and dependent on funds availability, promoting other school activities when funds are available, promoting halifax county athletics in the community, and encouraging the halifax county school board to adequately fund athletic programs and facilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.9%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.9% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.