Halifax Area Lodging Association In
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 592406058
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Daytona Beach Shores, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3867888680
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,124
- Expenses
- $56,615
- Assets
- $9,396
- Liabilities
- $6,626
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT DAVIDSON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT DAVIDSON (PRESIDENT): $13,938 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The halifax area lodging association is a business league of hotels as defined by code section 501 (c) (6), organized to promote common interest in the development of business conditions in the hotel/motel industry of the halifax area. The organization takes into consideration a study of various problems the industry has in its community. All revenue and expenditures of the organization are used to meeet this purpose in the form of meetings, seminars, hotel/motel adminstration and scholarships at the local colleges.
What it reported doing in 2025
Halifax area lodging association is a business league of hotels as defined by code section 501(c)6, organized to promote common interest in the development and improvement of business conditions in the hotel/motel industry of the halifax area. The organization takes into consideration a study of various problems the industry has in its community. All revenues and expenditures of the organization are used to meet this purpose in the form of meetings, seminars, hotel/motel administration and scholarships at the local colleges.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 72% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 14
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.1%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 13
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.1% of revenue deployed · 12.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $14K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.