Haiti Relief Fund Carlo Thertus
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201830776
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Lynbrook, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5165994248
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,729
- Expenses
- $7,704
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- CARLO THERTUS (PRINCEPAL OF)
- KAREN MICHEL (VICE PRESIDE)
- ERIC GOTTESMAN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide basic emergency relief of food, water, clothing and temporary stelters to the earthquake victims of haiti. 13 railroad containers of donated goods, including the above in addition to temporary shelters, construction equipment, medical equipment, drugs and medical suplies. This was all done on a volunteer basis, no individualese received and salaries or monies. No director received any compensation. The distribution of these goods to the victims of the earthquake can be viewed and is fully documented on the organizations website wwww.hatirelieffund.org. Many hospitals in the New York area donated medical equipment and pharmaceuticals, this included incubators, xray machines and sonogram machines, all to aid the people of haiti. Supplies were also donated to help rebuild a dialysis center.
What it reported doing in 2020
We have achieved sending clothing, materials for building, bleach water for the people of haitit. We have collected medical equipment from various medical facilities to equip a new kidney dialysis facility in port of prince
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.7%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -47.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -107.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.