Haileys Hope Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261387176
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Goshen, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9145848833
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health, General and Financing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,945
- Expenses
- $90,726
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFREY RANDAZZO (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEFFREY RANDAZZO (PRESIDENT)
- DONNA ZION (VICE PRESIDE)
- DEBRA RANDAZZO (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support families with premature and critically ill babies hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit. Through financial, emotional and informational support, we help families cope during this crisis, become their babies best advocate, and help improve nicu care.
What it reported doing in 2023
The mission consists of financial support to families while their child is in the neonatal intensive care unit. This assistance comes in the form of providing lodging near the hospital, meal vouchers, parking passes, gas cards, metro cards, breast pump rentals, etc. The foundation also has a welcome home discharge bag program for the babies leaving and helps provide equipment for the neonatal unit.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.7%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,199.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $84K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.