Hagerman Fire Department Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462881542
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
East Patchogue, NY, USA
Phone
6316542790
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fire Prevention

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,354
Expenses
$98,012
Assets
$371,999

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • TOM DUNHAM (CHIEF OF DEP)
  • TIMMY DUNHAM (1ST ASSISTAN)
  • COREY CITARELLA (2ND ASSISSTA)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Volunteer fire department dedicated to the prevention and extinguishment of fires, the protection of life and property and the safety of the east patchogue, portions of patchogue, and portions of the bellport communities located in the town of brookhaven on long island, New York. The department will also provide mutual aid, as requested, to the surrounding areas in the case of fire, rescue or any other emergency.

What it reported doing in 2022

The volunteer fire department repsonds to 100% of aid requests be it within the fire district or requests for mutual aid from other departments. This is accomplished by a 100% volunteer membership-based organization that promotes a positive atmospehere amoung the volunteer members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.8; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $98K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.