Hagar USA Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201507669
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Charlotte, NC, USA
Phone
9802720114
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Women's Rights
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$768,615
Expenses
$641,787
Assets
$360,101
Liabilities
$4,185

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • CATHERINE KIRKENDALL (EXECUTIVE DI): $107,979 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hagar USA, inc.s mission is communities free and healed from the trauma of human trafficking, slavery, and abuse.

What it reported doing in 2025

Human rights protection, recovery, and education hagar USA funds "the whole journey" for clients in cambodia, vietnam and afghanistan. This program provides safe accommodation, legal support, counseling, case management, education supports, economic empowerment and job training, and helps to build safety networks to prevent traumatic events from re-occuring. Hagar USA funds from a 3 year grant are providing hagar international with the capacity to expand trauma informed care operations in the northwest provinces of cambodia, expand empowerment programs and safe accommodation for women and children in afghanistan and provide safe and nurturing homes for survivors in recovery. Across these countries this grant will also increase prevention efforts to empower communities through awareness-raising materials and campaigns on trafficking, exploitation & abuse and assist in establishing a "center for excellence" promoting the care of those impacted by trauma. Hagar international is continuing their trauma informed care capacity building project in myanmar since 2017. The purpose of the project is to share hagars expertise in trauma recovery services in a country with very limited social services support for those who have suffered trauma. The funding helped to support hagar to develop curriculum, train, and provide ongoing coaching for 4 large ngos (serving tens of thousands of clients) on effective trauma care. The project continued in 2018 when the training of trainers model was implemented to expand the number of organizations who are trauma informed as well as supplemental training to address faith and resiliency needs of trauma suvivors and domestic violence awareness training and tools for christian NGO trainers. Hagar international is continuing to serve boy survivors of human trafficking in afghanistan. As part of the project they are also working with community leaders for prevention efforts and to raise greater awareness of the issue.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.7%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Pass
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.7% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $482K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $108K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.