Hacking Heroin Collaborative
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823759302
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Phone
- 5138236214
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Mental Health, Crisis Intervention N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $112,732
- Assets
- $124,107
- Liabilities
- $1,031
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ann Rittgers (President)
People named in this filing
- Ann Rittgers (President)
- Whitney Kelly (Director)
- Lee Cooper (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is focused on kickstarting new, creative ways for technology to play a role in the fight against the opioid epidemic.
What it reported doing in 2022
Realworks is piloting DynamiCare Health's contingency management platform to improve addiction treatment patients' engagement and abstinence, with 60 patients participating in this program in 2022. Realworks is piloting Headspace's mindfulness platform to address the addiction treatment workforce's risk for burnout, with 134 staff participating in this program. Realworks is piloting Amelia Virtual Care's virtual reality platform to improve addiction treatment patients' engagement in treatment, with 40 patients participating in 2022.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -36.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.