Habitat One
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 995041440
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Spearfish, SD, USA
- Phone
- 8144403423
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,135
- Expenses
- $18,029
- Assets
- $58,487
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREG CRONKHITE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN FREDERICKSON (TREASURER)
- GREG CRONKHITE (PRESIDENT)
- NATE KECK (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Habitat one will advocate for and aid landowners through state, federal and private funding to create additional habitat on their ground. We will accomplish these goals through private property assessments, recommendations and habitat plans that create a positive value proposition for the landowner utilizing proven conservation practices including education, conservation advocacy, habitat improvements and public access
What it reported doing in 2025
Habitat one's habitat conservation activities directly support its purpose of wildlife preservation and environmental stewardship.by restoring and maintaining habitats, habitat one creates sustainable environments for wildlife, which is the foundation of its mission. These projects protect ecosystems, promote biodiversity, and benefit the public by enhancing natural resources for recreation, education, and ecological health. Educational and advocacy activities further promote conservation awareness and responsible land use, expanding habitat one's impact and supporting their purposes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.7%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.24; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 23.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.