Habitat for Humanity Silicon Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930926083
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2009
Forms available
Form 990 2009
Location
Milpitas, CA, USA
Phone
4089426444
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,096,259
Expenses
$814,155
Assets
$5,425,197
Liabilities
$2,838,868

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Silicon valley habitat for humanity, inc. Transforms families and strengthens communities by partnering with volunteers, the community, and qualified families with low incomes, by building decent, affordable housing for long-term ownership.

What it reported doing in 2009

The Organization works in several areas.1)Housing Development which includes: Land Acquisition: Cultivating relationships with the Cities in the County of Santa Clara to locate and acquire land for affordable home construction. Construction: On-site building of homes; coordinating, training and supervision of all construction site volunteers.International: Providing for the construction of homes outside the United States. An amount of undesignated funds is donated annually to Habitat for Humanity International, as determined by the Organization's Board of Directors.2)Families and Volunteers which includes: Homeowner Relations: Extensive qualification and selection of families, training and managing long-term relationships with families.Volunteer Services: Recruiting, training and scheduling volunteers for all aspects of work; at the construction site, in the office, and on committees.Habitat for Humanity SILICON VALLEY (HFHSV) is consistently building 5-6 homes per year, which is a three-fold increase over our first 20 years of operation. The organization has developed the property resources, volunteer base, and funding needed to support this level of effort going forward. * HFHSV finished a 6-home project on Gianera Street in Santa Clara as FY09 came to close, which included the organization's affiliate's 50th home in Santa Clara County. The families moved into their homes in October 2009.* HFHSV created and expanded the Homeownership Training Curriculum, through which HFHSV conducted 34 programs for successful homeownership to help homeowners transition from renting to homeownership.* HFHSV served 43 existing homeowner families and 13 families selected for future homeownership.* HFHSV worked with 1,796 volunteers to complete 30,333 hours of building.* All homes now routinely incorporate green building materials and procedures. HFHSV now seek GreenPoint Rating or Leed certification for all homes.* HFHSV started Homeownership Readiness workshops in the City of Cupertino to prepare future homeowners for the application process of future Cupertino project.ABOUT 450 PEOPLE WERE SERVED DURING THE FISCAL YEAR.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.7%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.66; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $258K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.