Habitat for Humanity of Tuolumne County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770484186
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sonora, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2095360970
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $893,910
- Expenses
- $727,939
- Assets
- $2,369,070
- Liabilities
- $240,081
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRINITY ABILA (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- TRINITY ABILA (President & CEO): $76,704 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Habitat for humanity of tuolumne county (hfhtc) works under the guidance of god and in partnership with people from all walks of life to help deserving families create a better home, which contributes to the well-being of our homebuyers, homeowners, and our communities. Hfhtc works to build and sell homes to qualified families who would not ordinarily qualify for home financing in the conventional market. The goal is to work in partnership with the community and the beneficiary families to provide decent, affordable housing for the economically disadvantaged. Habitat for humanity of tuolumne county (hfhtc) is an independent affiliate of habitat for humanity, international. Like international, hfhtc is dedicated to eliminating substandard housing. Habitat believes every man, woman and child should have a decent, affordable home where they can live in dignity and safety. As an independent affiliate, we are responsible for obtaining our own funding for operations, to build homes, and cond
What it reported doing in 2024
Support services and costs of program and construction activities. During the prior fiscal year ending june 30, 2010, the affiliate purchases land for development and has committed its efforts in builing 35 residential units for qaulified families. The first four units were completed in 2012. All fundraising effort, support services and costs are allocable to this program.support services and cost of programs includes providing home repairs to those who would not otherwise be able to make necessary repairs to their homes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.3%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 60.3%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.6%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.25; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.3% of revenue deployed · 60.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $439K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $77K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.