Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931180321
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5032065248
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,396,475
- Expenses
- $3,420,178
- Assets
- $1,986,557
- Liabilities
- $502,949
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIC RICHARDSON (President)
- STEVE MESSINETTI (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- SHANNON TENNANT (Executive Dir.): $147,425 total reported compensation
- SARA PADILLA (GRANT PORT. DIR.): $115,566 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
What it reported doing in 2024
Training and technical assistance: the april 2025 western region conference welcomed a record number of attendees, bringing together 550 habitat staff, board members, and volunteersalong with generous sponsors, speakers, and housing partners from across the western united states and beyond. Centered on the theme framing brighter futures, the conference focused on building capacity, advancing housing justice, fostering resilience, and placing people at the heart of everything we do. The 2025 conference affirmed the strength, spirit, and determination of the habitat network and its affordable housing allies. In addition to this in-person conference, habitat Oregon hosted numerous webinars over the course of the year. We provided direct support to Oregon affiliates during times of key transition. Quarterly networking groups convened participants from a four-state area to discuss timely topics in five staff focus areas: construction technology, volunteer coordination, homeowner services, resource development and restore management.government relations and advocacy: habitat for humanity of Oregon has formed and supported the unlocking homeownership coalition. Anchored by dozens of nonprofits, homeownership developers and other aligned partners, this coalition stands united in the belief that homeownership is essential to building generational wealth, community stability and a more just Oregon. In march 2025, we hosted the first unlocking homeownership coalition advocacy day: nearly 100 advocates from 45+ organizations met with 66 Oregon legislators to push for better access to first-time and first-generation homeownership, and the increased supply of entry level homes for sale. Amid federal uncertainty and competing priorities for state resources, we secured key wins that move us closer to a future where more oregonians can put down roots and thrive. Disaster risk reduction and response: habitat Oregon promotes awareness of the potential impact of disasters in affiliate service areas, promotes risk reduction, assists affiliates with developing a continuity of operations plan and participates in statewide recovery planning. This body of work is a combination of information sharing and training with local affiliates. Habitat Oregon most frequently supports Oregon affiliates with immediate and long-term wildfire recovery by engaging key contacts from the state, as well as regional and national practitioners in wildfire recovery.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $297.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.8%; rating input score 98; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 94.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $147K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 33 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.