Habitat for Humanity of Omaha
Legal name: Habitat for Humanity of Omaha Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363283625
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Omaha, NE, US
- Phone
- (402) 457-5657
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $43,720,232
- Expenses
- $46,965,362
- Assets
- $63,170,592
- Liabilities
- $19,012,679
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMANDA BREWER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- AMANDA BREWER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $313,660 total reported compensation
- JOHN HASKE (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $263,826 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINE TJELMELAND (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $256,304 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Seeking to put God’s love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
What it reported doing in 2025
There is a critical need for affordable housing in omaha and communities across Nebraska. Habitat omaha helps address this need by building new homes and revitalizing neighborhoods that have experienced disinvestment and blight, including the bluestem prairie development.affordable homeownership can provide families with greater stability, security, and confidence. A safe, affordable home creates a foundation where families can thrive and children can grow and develop. When families have a home that supports their health and safety, they are better positioned to build a stronger future.homeownership can also create opportunities for families to save for the future, invest in education, strengthen employment opportunities, and build long-term financial stability. By helping families become homeowners, habitat omaha helps create stronger families, healthier neighborhoods, and more resilient communities.habitat omaha's homeownership program helps economically disadvantaged families achieve first-time homeownership. Partner families generally earn between 30% and 80% of the area median income.habitat omaha makes homeownership affordable by combining volunteer labor, efficient building methods, modestly sized homes, and donated construction materials and appliances. In 2025, individuals, corporations, and faith partners contributed 33,541 volunteer hours, helping habitat omaha reduce construction costs and build 104 homes for sale to partner families.habitat omaha also provides a range of housing support services to help families prepare for and achieve homeownership. In 2025, 1,159 families were served through these programs. Of those, 155 families achieved mortgage readiness, while another 467 families actively participated in habitat omaha's home journey program to work to become mortgage ready.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.2%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 97.2% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $42.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $314K · 29 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $9.9M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.