Habitat for Humanity of Greater Ingham County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383298306
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Lansing, MI, USA
Phone
5173741313
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,547
Expenses
$81,501
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KARL GRIFFIN (PRESIDENT)
  • VICKI HAMILTON-ALLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • KARL GRIFFIN (PRESIDENT)
  • KIM OBLAK (SECRETARY)
  • CHRISTOPHER BROOKS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god to develop communities for people in need by building and renovating houses, so there are decent communities in which people can live and grow into all that god intended.

What it reported doing in 2015

Restore: the restore is a retail store operated by hfh. The store accepts donations from individuals and businesses of new and gently used building materials, tools, furniture, and appliances. These items are sold to the public at less than retail prices. The restore provides our community with high quality materials at reasonable prices to improve and rebuild existing homes. The restore recycles materials, reduces resources consumed, and diverts many tons of materials from landfills each year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 24
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.7%; rating input score 23
  • Program expense ratio: 25.8%; rating input score 26

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -74.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.7% of revenue deployed · 25.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.