Habitat for Humanity of Evansville
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351602775
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Evansville, IN, USA
- Phone
- 812-423-5623
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,158,162
- Expenses
- $8,339,899
- Assets
- $16,805,167
- Liabilities
- $3,294,938
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANYELLE GRANGER (PRESIDENT)
- PHILLIP JASON STEPHENSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BETH FOLZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BETH FOLZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $124,913 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Seeking to put God’s love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. The Marketing and Public Relations Manager at Habitat is responsible for the creation and implementation of a robust communication plan to increase the awareness of Habitat’s mission and to grow support for that mission. We seek to put God’s love into action by building homes, communities and hope for low-income families in need of a safe, decent and affordable place to live! Job Type: Full-time Pay: $25.00 – $30.00 per hour. Helping Families Improve Their Shelter Conditions Habitat for Humanity of Evansville is a part of a global, nonprofit housing organization operated on Christian principles and is dedicated to eliminating substandard housing locally and worldwide by constructing, rehabilitating, and preserving homes. We are advocates for fair and just housing...
What it reported doing in 2024
Habitat for humanity of evansville (habitat) partners with low-income families in need of a decent place to live to build safe and affordable homes. Habitat makes housing affordable to purchase by using the labor of volunteers and prospective homeowners, employing efficient building methods, keeping house sizes modest, using donated construction materials, and providing no-interest loans. Affordable homeownership helps create conditions that free families from instability, stress and fear, and encourage self-reliance and confidence. During the current fiscal year, habitat completed 24 homes for low-income families and had 22 homes in process. Habitat held 340 interest-free mortgages for homeowners at year end.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.5%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 77.5% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 25 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.