Habitat for Humanity Las Vegas

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880268803
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Phone
7026386477
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,463,630
Expenses
$1,269,460
Assets
$7,421,143
Liabilities
$1,787,252

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGELA PHILLIPS (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANGELA PHILLIPS (CEO): $130,727 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Habitat for humanity las vegas, inc. (habitat) a not-for-profit organization located in las vegas, Nevada was established in 1990. Habitat's purpose is to build low cost houses with the help of the homeowner families, which are transferred to the families at no profit and financed by habitat with affordable, no-interest loans.

What it reported doing in 2024

Since 1991, habitat for humanity las vegas (hfhlv) has been building affordable housing in the las vegas community and has provided safe, secure shelter for over 121 local low-to-moderate income families - 418 people, including 264 children - while also completing 87 neighborhood revitalization projects in the same areas in which we built homes. In 2022, habitat expanded their program delivery and began providing financial education courses to local low-to-middle income people and have held 142 classes and assisted 155 households to organize their finances. Hfhlv operates autonomously from habitat for humanity international with its own local board of directors, funding sources and strategic goals for lifting families out of poverty in clark county. We bring people together to build homes, communities, and hope. We meet the needs of the low-to-moderate income families today while transforming their lives for years to come. We focus on building entire communities on previously vacant in-fill lots in clark county; redevelopment zones not suitable for a private developer. Then, using a rigorous selection, education and financial coaching process, we fill the homes with families who become successful homeowners. Hfhlv is not just about the construction of homes. We are about successful homeownership through careful selection of partner families, responsible lending and ongoing support. We invest in the families through financial literacy, home maintenance programs, long-term credit counseling and referrals to community services. Homeownership leads to other quality of life outcomes-improved health, safety, education, and financial opportunity. The gift of a home means so much more than a roof over someone's head. Homeownership is often a catalyst to wealth building, and its impact grows over time with each generation as we break down barriers of limited housing supply, restricted access to credit, and systemic inequities, especially for households of color or single women. Our approach to housing is unique as we provide a solution to the root cause of generational poverty and break its cycle. In addition to making the dream of affordable home ownership a reality, we improve existing homes through our critical home repair program for those impacted by age, disability or family circumstances that are hindered to afford important home maintenance for sustaining, preservation, and safety. Together we can provide a brighter future for families and entire communities, giving those who need it most a "hand up" versus a "hand out."

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for affiliated organizations.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 32%; rating input score 32
  • Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 48.5%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.85; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 32% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $879K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $131K · 13 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $109K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.