Habitat for Humanity Kansas Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920991356
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,693
Expenses
$118,001
Assets
$58,445
Liabilities
$39,528

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHAWNA WILLIAMS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHAWNA WILLIAMS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PRESIDENT)
  • ERIKA ZIMMERMAN (BOARD CHAIRPERSON)
  • JANICE WATKINS (BOARD TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Seeking to put gods love into action habitat for humanity Kansas brings people together to build homes communities and hope. Hfhks builds the capacity of local habitat humanity affiliates in Kansas by increasing access to resources facilitating communication between affiliates and the community and providing statewide leadership toward the creation of thriving communities that support healthy families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided training and technology support to 14 local habitat organizations across Kansas in order to build affiliate capacity and compliance with regulations so they may increase their ability to build safe affordable housing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 8
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.3%; rating input score 8
  • Program expense ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 7

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.68; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 66.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -34.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.3% of revenue deployed · 7.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.