Oconee County Habitat for Humanity
Legal name: Habitat for Humanity International Oconee County Habitat for Humanity
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570826412
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Seneca, SC, United States
- Phone
- (864) 888-2118
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,304,651
- Expenses
- $1,055,330
- Assets
- $5,107,125
- Liabilities
- $334,677
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN PRATHER (PRESIDENT)
- CINDY PRATHER (ADVISORY TO PRESIDENT)
- THOMAS MCCLUSKEY (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRANDON GRACE (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN PRATHER (PRESIDENT)
- CINDY PRATHER (ADVISORY TO PRESIDENT)
- THOMAS MCCLUSKEY (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Seeking to put God's love into action, Oconee County Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope, committed to eliminating substandard housing in Oconee County. Our vision is a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Seeking to put God's love into action, Oconee County Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. Oconee County Habitat for Humanity is deeply rooted in the community and is committed to eliminating substandard housing in Oconee County. With the support of our 200 volunteer members, we provide families with the opportunity to improve their standard of living by acquiring a home of their own. Our commitment to the community is unwavering, and we sell the homes we build to families in need with no profit and an interest free mortgage, ensuring that our mission is always community-focused. Our.
What it reported doing in 2024
Homeownership program: families in need of a decent place to live build safe and affordable homes in partnership with us. Habitat houses are modestly sized. They are large enough for the homeowner family's needs, but small enough to keep construction and maintenance costs affordable. By using the labor of volunteers and prospective homeowners, employing efficient building methods, keeping house sizes modest, using donated construction materials and appliances, and issuing no-profit loans, habitat makes its houses affordable for low-income families to purchase. Affordable homeownership helps create the conditions that free families from instability, street fear and encourage self-reliance and confidence. Studies show that strong and stable households are foundational to child development and growth. When a home fosters-instead of hinders-health and safety, families can flourish. Owning an affordable home also allows homeowners to lift up career growth. During fiscal year 2024, habitat completed and sold three homes to families in need.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54.2%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.84; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 44% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $994K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.