Habitat for Humanity International Inc Stroud

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731373921
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Stroud, OK, USA
Phone
9182909029
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,509
Expenses
$14,193
Assets
$616,904
Liabilities
$44,302

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOE BILL SHELHOPE (Vice President)
  • MARILYN WHEELER (President)

People named in this filing

  • JOE BILL SHELHOPE (Vice President)
  • ROBIN SMITH (BOARD MEMBER)
  • GRETCHEN HARLOW (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building and renovating houses so that there are decent houses in decent communities in which people can live and grow into all that god intended.an estimated 5.4 million american households face worst-case housing needs, according to the u.s. Department of housing and urban development. Receiving little or no government housing assistance, these families are unable to find a decent place to live at a price they can afford to pay.

What it reported doing in 2019

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY WORKS IN PARTNERSHIP WITH GOD AND PEOPLE EVERYWHERE, FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE, TO DEVELOP COMMUNITIES WITH GOD'S PEOPLE IN NEED BY BUILDING AND RENOVATING HOUSES SO THAT THERE ARE DECENT HOUSES IN DECENT COMMUNITIES IN WHICH PEOPLE CAN LIVE AND GROW INTO ALL THAT GOD INTENDED.AN ESTIMATED 5.4 MILLION AMERICAN HOUSEHOLDS FACE WORST-CASE HOUSING NEEDS, ACCORDING TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. RECEIVING LITTLE OR NO GOVERNMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE, THESE FAMILIES ARE UNABLE TO FIND A DECENT PLACE TO LIVE AT A PRICE THEY CAN AFFORD TO PAY.MORE THAN 1500 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AFFILIATES ARE AT WORK IN THE UNITED STATES, BUILDING HOUSES IN PARTNERSHIP WITH PEOPLE IN NEED OF DECENT, AFFORDABLE HOUSING. HABITAT HOUSES ARE PURCHASED BY FAMILIES AT PRICES AFFORDABLE TO LOW-INCOME AMERICANS, THANKS TO THE DONATED LABOR OF HABITAT VOLUNTEERS, THE SUPPORT OF PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS AND THE NO-PROFIT, NO-INTEREST TERMS OF EACH U.S. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MORTGAGE.habitat for humanity has helped change the lives of more than 30,000 american families since its first u.s. affiliate was founded in san antonio, texas in 1978. habitat for humanity affiliates build in all 50 u.s. states, the district of columbia, puerto rico and the u.s. virgin islands. each affiliate is an independent, locally managed organization which coordinates local construction and selects partner families without regard to race, religion or ethnic group.THE STROUD AFFILIATE OF HABITAT FOR HUMANITY STRIVES TO CONSTRUCT ONE NEW HOME PER YEAR IN STROUD, OKLAHOMA AND SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF ONE NEW HOME PER YEAR IN MALAWI.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.2%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1,465.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 43.47; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.2% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.