Habitable

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205036229
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2027415717
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Safety, Disaster Preparedness & Relief N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,206,403
Expenses
$6,140,564
Assets
$3,026,599
Liabilities
$335,875

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GINA CIGANIK (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • GINA CIGANIK (CEO): $232,862 total reported compensation
  • PRIYA PREMCHANDRAN - VP MARKET (TRANSFORMATI): $220,508 total reported compensation
  • HEATHER MCKENNEY - CHEMFORWARD SAFE (CHEMISTRY LE): $218,259 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Habitable has a vision that all people and the planet thrive when the materials economy is in balance with nature. Our mission is to improve human and environmental health by creating bold, science-based solutions that inspire materials innovations to eliminate pollution, mitigate climate change, and create a more equitable future. Habitable is a leading organization reducing pollution by advocating for a reduction in the use of toxic chemicals and plastics throughout the supply chain as products are made, used, and disposed. Our five key strategies are: 1) build capacity for informed decisions, 2) drive market demand and adoption, 3) increase transparency and public disclosure, 4) reduce chemicals of concern use, and 5) decrease exposure to toxic chemicals.

What it reported doing in 2025

Habitable currently has programs in three areas: innovative research; powerful data tools; and capacity-building education. 1.innovative research habitable publishes innovative, actionable research that advances human and environmental health. For example, kaiser permanente cited habitable's research as the driver for its decision to prohibit the use of antimicrobial additives in its building product specification, and the home depot relied upon habitable's research to adopt a hazard avoidance chemical strategy that signals fundamental, permanent and systemic improvement in the building products industry, and is a strong step towards health equity in building products. In addition, our influential electronic publications reach thousands of healthy building professionals, scientists, researchers and others interested in decreasing chemicals of concern and are key resources for opinion leaders in the field. As a thought leader, habitable focuses on market trends and policy issues that impact the green building community and other product markets that support a circular economy. In communicating our latest research findings we are often the first to raise new issues of concern that cross-cut sectors, like issues related to plastics, embodied carbon, and climate change. 2.powerful data tools habitable offers data tools designed to increase knowledge, promote transparency and inspire safer chemistry and product innovation. It is currently difficult to identify healthier building materials and other types of products because product ingredients are not typically or reliably disclosed by industry. Habitable is an acknowledged leader in advancing the disclosure of the contents and related health hazards in commonly used building products, and we are advancing resources in other sectors. Our data tools include: pharos: the most comprehensive independent database of chemicals, polymers, metals, and other substances - currently over 200,000 chemicals and growing. It is used across sectors, including the built environment, electronics, food packaging, beauty and personal care, and many other consumer products. Using dozens of scientific lists for specific human and environmental health hazards, it aggregates a vast array of information used for analyzing chemicals of concern. The tool also provides a wealth of information on certifications and standards used to measure the health impacts of chemicals and materials, including voc content and emissions, recycled and biobased content, and much more. Informed: leveraging our deep research and common product methodology habitable is able to screen product types (i.e., flooring, insulation, paint, etc.) where transparency from manufacturers is incomplete or simply does not exist. Leveraging this methodology habitable is able to classify the product types into a red to green (worst to best) ranking. Access to these product rankings is provided through our informed application, resources, and consulting services. Chemforward: fiscally sponsored by habitable, the program's mission is to be the most-trusted source for actionable chemical hazard information that empowers suppliers, manufacturers and brands across all sectors to create products that are safe for people and the environment. The mission will be realized by collaborating with the value chain to provide cost-efficient access to verified, actionable chemical hazard information and thereby enable better chemistry in product design and manufacturing. In the landscape of material-health and safer chemistry initiatives, chemforward supports organizations developing chemical guidelines (retailers, brands, ngos, certifiers) that provide trusted evidence-base safer products. Sum decelerator: fiscally sponsored by habitable, the program's goal is to educate the food industry on the impact of single use packaging and to reduce or eliminate their common use to improve both health and the environmental well-being. The safer chemistry impact fund (sc

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $233K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $745K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.