Habeneri

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920730442
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,778
Expenses
$71,186
Assets
$124,643
Liabilities
$15,250

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dr Haile Mezgebe (President and Board Member)
  • Dr Aron Kefela (Vice President and Board Member)

People named in this filing

  • Mr Fitsum Michael (CIO and Board Member)
  • Mr Filmon Tewolde (CFO and and Board Member)
  • Dr Haile Mezgebe (President and Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To make a significant contribution to the lives of the disabled by providing material and professional support designed to fulfill their short and long-term goals.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mobile clinic Annual budget: Assisted in covering financial costs needed to support medical professionals who dedicated time and resources to visiting disabled persons in smaller towns and the countryside. Through this program physical exams appropriate screening medical supplies and medication were available to those in need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 31.9%; rating input score 32
  • Program expense ratio: 51.9%; rating input score 52

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 59.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 76.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 90% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 31.9% of revenue deployed · 51.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.