H&w S T E a M Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475358196
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Grovetown, GA, USA
- Phone
- 3134551785
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $38,995
- Expenses
- $38,995
- Assets
- $38,995
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- Nehemiah Harvard (Founder)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advancing health equity in underserved populations requires an innovative, community-centered approach that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) and digital health tools. This white paper proposes a framework for AI-driven smart health equity - a system of community-based biomedical monitoring and preventive analytics designed to bridge gaps in preventive care. The strategic vision is to empower underserved communities with continuous health monitoring, personalized early warnings, and culturally tailored interventions delivered through community health networks. By integrating wearable biomedical sensors, AI analytics, and human-centered design, the framework enables early detection of health issues and proactive preventive care outside traditional clinical settings. The overarching goal is to reduce health disparities by ensuring that all populations benefit equitably from advancements in digital health.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided hands-on AI literacy workshop series designed to equip NSBE Jr. students with future-ready skills in artificial intelligence, ethics, and innovation. This was aligned with NSBE PCI's focus areas of AI literacy, engineering fundamentals, and sustainability, offering students practical exposure to emerging technologies through culturally relevant, gamified, and project-based learning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.6%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 25.6%; rating input score 26
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.6% of revenue deployed · 25.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.