H-CAP Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134240990
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2124940560
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonprofit Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,612,677
- Expenses
- $11,894,723
- Assets
- $4,250,418
- Liabilities
- $1,809,012
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
50 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Danielle Copeland (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Danielle Copeland (Executive Director): $224,186 total reported compensation
- Rebecca Von Loewenfeldt (Associate Director): $189,612 total reported compensation
- Tamara Martial-Dolcy (Director of Communications & Data): $177,598 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See Schedule O.
What it reported doing in 2025
Labor-Management Programs
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 44 of 44 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $224K · 50 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $7.7M reported
- Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.