Gymnastics Village Boys Booster
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454512634
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Amherst, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6038898092
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,509
- Expenses
- $60,777
- Assets
- $3,347
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE CONLEY (PRESIDENT (SEPT 24 THRU FEB 25))
- GALE BLAIS (PRESIDENT (MAR THRU AUG 25))
- JOYCE HAWKINSON (VICE PRESIDENT (MAR THRU AUG 25)
People named in this filing
- MIKE CONLEY (PRESIDENT (SEPT 24 THRU FEB 25))
- ANN EDWARDS (SECRETARY)
- MEREDITH PRINCIPE (TREASURER (MAR THRU AUG 25))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Gymnastics Village Boy's Booster Club is organized to provide support to the Gymnastics Village Boy's competition teams and to promote increased opportunities for competitive gymnastics in New Hampshire. All funds, whether income or principal, and whether acquired by gift, contribution or otherwise, shall be devoted to said purpose.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Gymnastics Village organizes various activities for promotion of sports. These expenses are related to organizing such activities which involve purchase of various sports equipment and payments to contractors hired for these events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.8% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.