Gyaan Ka Saagar

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274289775
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Rahway, NJ, United States
Phone
+1 (973) 123-4567
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hinduism
Affiliation
Hinduism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,791
Expenses
$106,930
Assets
$58,784
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Malcolm Bhisham Misir (Director/President/CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Malcolm Bhisham Misir (Director/President/CEO)
  • Gireeraj Beggs (Director/Secretary)
  • Sattie S Khemai (Director/Treasurer/CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Gyaan Ka Saagar works to preserve Sanātana Dharma by sharing Guruji’s lectures online. (Exact mission statement text was not available in the provided crawl; this is derived from mission-like purpose language.). Gyaan Ka Saagar is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. All courses are free, though we welcome and appreciate your support via any financial contributions you are willing to provide for the development and maintenance of our Mandir. +1 (973) 123-4567 [email protected]. Our Vision Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis. Our Mission. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec tetur adipiscing elit. Read More.

What it reported doing in 2025

We were able to continue promoting faith based programs for the community and recognize the youths for their dedication and participation of the Hindu Faith thus keeping them grounded in the path of spirituality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -675.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.