Gwynedd Mercy University
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231352613
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Gwynedd Valley, PA, US
- Phone
- 800-342-5462 or 215-641-5510
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Undergraduate College (4-year)
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,210,000
- Expenses
- $66,824,000
- Assets
- $149,577,000
- Liabilities
- $41,414,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEANNE D'EMILIO (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DEANNE D'EMILIO (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $550,334 total reported compensation
- JAMES TRUSDELL (CHIEF OPERATION OFFICER): $256,313 total reported compensation
- JEFFREY R BREESE (PROVOST, VP, ACAD AFF (UNTIL 12/24)): $218,668 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Gwynedd Mercy University, a Catholic university founded by the Sisters of Mercy, educates students in the liberal arts and professional studies to be ethical leaders who serve a diverse and global community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Financial aid - to students - gwynedd mercy university provides access to higher education for a diverse group of students, including those with high financial need. In fiscal 2024-2025, 100% of full-time, first-time traditional degree-seeking undergraduate students received some form of financial aid. To further provide students access to a great education at an affordable cost, gwynedd mercy university offers many scholarships and grants. Known as "gift assistance," these scholarships and grants do not need to be repaid, and generally are renewable for an additional three years for first-year undergraduate students and two years for transfer undergraduate students. Undergraduate tuition is set for the academic year based on academic programs. Students also are charged a comprehensive fee, which contributes toward the costs of providing computer/technology access, activities, use of facilities, and other resources and services generally available to all students. Graduate and accelerated program tuition is billed per credit hour and the administrative costs of a student's education are covered through program fees. Full-time traditional undergraduate students receive award letters detailing any aid for which they are eligible. Gmercyu's aid packages account for tuition, fees, room, board, books, supplies, transportation, and miscellaneous expenses. A typical aid package includes grants or scholarships, a low-interest student loan, and campus employment (up to 15 hours per week). Undergraduates will likely receive the same amount all four years as long as they submit the fafsa annually, continue to meet all conditions of the award, and their need remains essentially unchanged.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some related-organization disclosures are missing.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 97
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95%; rating input score 95; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.5%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.24; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 77% of revenue deployed · 81.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $54.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $550K · 33 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $21.9M reported
- Consistency: 41 of 43 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.