Gunilda Rianda Senior Center Association Rianda House Senior Activity Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202411077
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
St Helena, CA, USA
Phone
7079638555
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neighborhood Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,815,756
Expenses
$820,639
Assets
$4,643,171
Liabilities
$3,407

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • Maury Robertson (Executive Dir.): $143,393 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rianda House is committed to providing UpValley seniors with programs, support services and experiences that stimulate minds, strengthen bodies and promote independent living through education, recreation and social involvement.

What it reported doing in 2025

Rianda House, the only Senior Center in Northern Napa County, serves the cities and unincorporated areas of Yountville, St. Helena, Calistoga, Angwin, Pope, Valley, and Berryessa Estates. The organization is supported by a dedicated team of seven board members, three full-time staff, four part-time staff, and 27 part time instructors.For many older adults in Northern Napa County, Rianda House is a shelter in a storm. It's a place where people step back from the roller coaster of current events and ground themselves in our shared humanity. It is truly exceptional! One has to experience it firsthand to fully grasp its uniqueness. Rianda House provides an environment of authentic inclusivity and support for older adults. We provide community, belonging, and inspiration, all while providing an opportunity to bring fitness (physical and mental), continued education through arts, music and language, and the exploration of a new passion into the lives of our residents.Rianda House is free to all. There are no fees, no memberships, and no contracts. This removes the financial barrier for those who most need our services. 40% of our participants have household incomes under $50,000 a year and two-thirds have household incomes under $75,000 a year. Nearly all of our funding comes from the generosity of individuals donors, who supply 85% of our income. Over the past three years, we have experienced dramatic growth, from 6,408 visits in 2022 to 18,270 visits in 2025. We serve over 1500 unique participants each year, offering an average of 175 events every month. These include: in person and online classes, workshops, counseling sessions, group, discussions, language instruction (ESL), congregate, dining, concerts, lectures, exercise, music, and off-site activities, such as hikes in the surrounding area. As the population ages, our services are becoming increasingly vital.Rianda house is a trusted resource for seniors in crisis. Because of our close partnerships with the city, county, state, and other nonprofits, we are experts at the hand-off. We disseminate life-saving information to those in crisis: medical services, financial aid, and legal assistance, to name a few. The wide array of services can be overwhelming. We make it easy.Rianda House advocates for older adults in Northern Napa County by contributing weekly articles to the Saint Helena Star and by communicating with our mailing list of 2300 senior adults.We love to give personal tours of Rianda House. Drop by anytime. You can also visit our website at riandahouse.org.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.9%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.8%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.66; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.9% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $588K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.