Guiding Grace Family Support Network

Legal name: Guiding Grace Motherhood Support Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934161756
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Omaha, NE, United States
Phone
531-999-3024
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Womens' Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,024,362
Expenses
$753,446
Assets
$2,664,190
Liabilities
$135,170

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GINA TOMES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • GINA TOMES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $51,154 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To be a steady, relational place where individuals and families feel safe, supported, and empowered.

What it reported doing in 2025

Aftercare offers continued case management, home visitation, housing navigation, job readiness, continued education support, including nightly evidence-based classes. Classes cover topics ranging from financial education, parenting, employment coaching & networking, codependency, sexual integrity, abortion healing, grief support, and addiction recovery support. We hope to strengthen our participants' sense of community and fellowship as we strengthen families, increase income levels, and stabilize housing. 118 individuals secured housing, 295 hours of educational classes, 3,950 hours of case management provided, 6 vehicles provided to families to eliminate transportation barriers, 7 families completed financial eduction, 14 improved their credit scores. 29 secured full-time employment, rotective services cases were closed successfully.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 13.9%; rating input score 14
  • Program expense ratio: 55.7%; rating input score 56
  • Fundraising efficiency: $64.3 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 75.1%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.54; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 97% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 168.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 168.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 13.9% of revenue deployed · 55.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $419K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $51K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.