Guidance to Success Youth Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270692644
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Lincoln, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4024641661
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Centers, Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $427,881
- Expenses
- $434,412
- Assets
- $29,369
- Liabilities
- $21,125
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FELICIA MENDOZA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELO STABLER (EXECUTIVE DI): $33,303 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide preventative and proactive appraoches for at-risk youth to guide them to become successful in life, school, and sports.
What it reported doing in 2016
Athletic activities - youth in our programs are engaged through various athletic activities. Some are team-oriented like our many competitive basketball and soccer teams. It can also be in our fitness programs designed for day-to-day exercise and physical health education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 65.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 56.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.1% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $394K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $33K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.