RySG GTLD Registries Stakeholder Group
Legal name: Gtld Registries Stakeholder Group Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813135949
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Louisa, KY, USA
- Phone
- 9893210365
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $160,364
- Expenses
- $183,297
- Assets
- $222,702
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELIZABETH BACON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ELIZABETH BACON (PRESIDENT)
- CATHERINE PALETTA (VICE PRESIDE)
- JEFF NEUMAN (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary role of the Generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) Registries Stakeholder Group Corp. within the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) is to represent the interests of gTLD Registries who are currently under contract with ICANN to provide gTLD Registry Services.
The gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group Corp. (RySG) represents the interests of generic top-level domain registries under contract with ICANN to provide registry services. It facilitates communication among gTLD registries and conveys their views to the GNSO Council and ICANN Board, focusing on consensus policies that affect the Internet's interoperability, technical reliability, and stable operation. The group operates under a charter formed according to ICANN Bylaws and is guided by principles of fairness, openness, and transparency.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: Filed program service accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.