Gsmbc Community Development Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
812247513
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Headland, AL, USA
Phone
2054824786
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,178
Expenses
$87,234
Assets
$1,758,167
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DELVICK J MCKAY (PRESIDENT/CH)

People named in this filing

  • DWIGHT GAMBLE (BOARD MEMBER)
  • ELSTON JONES (BOARD MEMBER)
  • DELVICK J MCKAY (PRESIDENT/CH)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide social services, educational training, life-skill development, and quality of life to all residents of headland/henry county and the wiregrass community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Education the center has a partnership with wallace community college to facilitate the ged/adult education program to engage those individuals without a high school education in the headland/henry county community to complete their ged and to become proficient in life skills by becoming employable and self-sufficient. The relationship with wallace college will provide a gateway of possibilities for individuals to explore career opportunities by bringing the "college to the community". We would expand our relationship with wallace college and our local schools by hosting career fairs and exploration days, workforce development seminars, and bridging the gap between individuals and opportunities that exist within industry and education. The ged/adult education program participants will have their progress monitored by the instructor assigned by wallace college. Ged practice tests and assessments in math, science, and language arts would be given to establish initial baselines and a work plan developed by the program instructor to set individual goals in preparing them for the examination. Computer based training and standard teaching modules will be provided with the center having within it, a computer lab with wireless access points and meeting rooms for instruction. After-school tutoring and summer enrichment programs will be provided in the areas of math, science, engineering, technology, and the arts. In partnership with certified teachers within the school system, along with community volunteers with requisite experience in tutoring; math, science, and reading tutoring will be provided for students who need assistance at no cost. Teachers and tutors will have background checks performed and the center will maintain the highest level of accountability. Teachers/tutors will have meetings with parents to establish an effective, collaborative relationship and each student will be monitored throughout the school year (weekly assignments, progress reports, and report cards) to gauge the success of the center's tutoring program and to know what areas of concern each tutoring session needs to focus on. Computer based modules and one-on-one tutoring sessions using worksheets and books will be utilized. More specifically, the computer software program aleks will be used. Aleks stands for assessment and learning in knowledge spaces, which is an online program for math, science, reading, and behavioral science. The learning is personalized and the assessments are adaptive, allowing the aleks to deliver the exact content that the student needs. The aleks quickly assesses the student's knowledge of a course by using just 20 to 30 questions in most cases. The reason the aleks works so well in such a short period of time 45 minutes or so) is that it adapts to the student's responses. In other words, each question is based on the student's answers to all of the previous questions. Using this program allows tutors to establish a baseline and work in partnership with the students' teachers in building upon the skills they are learning in the classroom each day. The center would use the sra reading laboratory. A proven k-12 leveled reading program to help students and parents/guardians to promote reading and reading comprehension with their children. As one of the earliest personalized learning programs, sra reading laboratory has improved the reading and independent learning skills of more than 100 million students in 63 countries, becoming one of the most trusted names in literacy learning. With an easy-to-use box of self-guided and leveled selections for a given classroom, sra reading laboratory lets you develop confident readers through supplemental and personalized k-12 reading content that ensures each student is working at the appropriate level and moving ahead at his or her own pace. The program helps students: o develop comprehension, vocabulary, fluency, word analysis, and study skills o reinforce specific skills in which certain st

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 13
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 15%; rating input score 15
  • Program expense ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 13
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.15; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -48.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 15% of revenue deployed · 13.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.